Compare support paths

Choose the support layer. Do not overbuy.

Start with the public syllabus. Add the smallest support layer that changes the outcome: self-paced guidance, live accountability, private review, architecture guidance, or institutional delivery.

VS Code compare hero iconWhatsApp compare hero iconGitHub compare hero icon
Public floor
₹0
Support ladder
From INR 4,999
Enrollment
WhatsApp

Founder recommendation

Most learners should choose the smallest useful support layer.

Read enough before paying.: The public proof layer exists so trust is earned before a support conversation.

Choose the smallest useful layer.: Move up only when support, live accountability, or private review changes the work.

Keep proof as the final standard.: The right support path should leave a repository, demo, review note, roadmap, or workshop artifact.

Decision proof

Choose by the support you need, not by the biggest price.

Each support path wraps the same public proof layer with a different support surface. The right path is the one that helps you produce inspectable work without over-buying.

Tool and platform logos are context references only: no affiliation, endorsement, interview access, hiring promise, salary promise, or placement guarantee.

Self-paced proof

You can study alone if you keep shipping.

VS Code iconGitHub Copilot iconJavaScript icon

Job-Ready fits when you can turn written lessons into editor work, commits, and small demos without a fixed live schedule.

Open Job-Ready Track

Cohort proof

You need checkpoints if you abandon courses.

GitHub iconGit iconCloudflare icon

Cohort support adds live group pressure around commits, demos, and deployment issues so the work leaves the browser tab and becomes visible.

Open Cohort

Private proof

You need senior attention when stakes are real.

Docker iconAWS iconGoogle Cloud icon

Mentorship and architecture review fit learners or engineers bringing a real product, stack decision, cloud question, or career transition.

Open Mentorship

Institutional proof

Teams need a shared engineering language.

OpenAI iconMicrosoft iconGoogle icon

Workshops translate AI product vocabulary into a common operating language for classrooms, departments, and engineering teams.

Open Workshop

Current status

The first proof goal is one right-fit learner or institution served well.

ABCsteps is not pretending to have thousands of paid graduates. The public proof layer demonstrates the teaching style; the support paths exist to convert that reading into founder-supported work.

Cloudflare current status icon

What is real now

The 20-lesson syllabus, engineering articles, glossary, reading paths, and direct founder contact are live on the static site.

WhatsApp current status icon

What is founder-delivered

Study packs, WhatsApp doubt support, project reviews, cohorts, mentorship, and workshops are coordinated manually before any learner pays.

GitHub current status icon

What is not claimed

No placement guarantee, salary promise, hiring access, fake graduate count, automated LMS, or hidden partnership claim.

Which support path fits?

An honest decision tree.

Most learners are over-paying or over-buying when they choose support. The questions below are how I'd advise you on a WhatsApp call. Read down the column that matches you and the right path becomes obvious.

Recommends → Job-Ready Track

You are a beginner with time to learn at your own pace

Self-paced is genuinely fine for a determined learner. Job-Ready gives you the study pack, recorded walkthroughs, and async WhatsApp Q&A around the same public curriculum. Do not pay for live calls you may not attend.

Go to Job-Ready Track

Recommends → Cohort

You have started self-paced courses before and never finished

Honest answer: Job-Ready alone is not for you. The Cohort gives you scheduled live calls, a peer group, and a final project review — the accountability that converts intent into output.

Go to Cohort

Recommends → Mentorship

You are switching careers or building a real product alongside the course

You need direct founder access. Mentorship gives you four 1:1 sessions over 8 weeks, a written roadmap, and founder-prioritized async replies inside the engagement scope. This is the right support path when stakes are high and your time is scarce.

Go to Mentorship

Recommends → Architecture Review

You are a senior engineer who already knows the foundations

You do not need the curriculum. What you need is a focused second opinion on a specific decision. Architecture Review is one 2-hour session plus a written roadmap — designed for engineers in transition.

Go to Architecture Review

Recommends → Workshop

You represent a college, school, or engineering team

Individual support paths do not scale to 30 people. Workshop support is a 2-day intensive tuned to your audience. The scoping conversation has no charge; the engagement is INR 2L–5L depending on size and customization.

Go to Workshop

Recommends → Job-Ready Track

You are still not sure which support path fits

Send a WhatsApp message describing your situation honestly. Divyanshu will tell you which path is the right fit — including "you do not need support yet, just read the blog first" if that is the truthful answer.

Go to Job-Ready Track

Fit-check message

Ask with context. Then choose the path.

A useful enquiry is not "which course is best?" It names your current level, available time, target proof, and whether you need async support, live accountability, private review, or institutional delivery.

Static boundary: this page does not collect form data, create accounts, start checkout, or store learner progress. The first step is a human fit-check.

Student or self-learner

Name your weekly time and target project.

VS Code fit message icon

This usually separates the public syllabus, Job-Ready Track, and Cohort. Time discipline matters more than buying more support.

Send: I can study __ hours/week. I want to build __. I need async Q&A / live accountability / only public reading.

Review Job-Ready Track

Working professional

Bring the real blocker.

GitHub fit message icon

If the blocker is a role transition, real codebase, stack decision, or product direction, the question may be mentorship or architecture review rather than another course.

Send: I work in __. My blocker is __. I already know __. I need course structure / private review / architecture decision support.

Review Mentorship

Institution or team

Lead with audience size and outcome.

Microsoft fit message icon

Workshops are scoped around the group, not sold as a generic fixed plan. The useful first message names audience, level, dates, and target capability.

Send: We are __ with __ learners/team members. Current level is __. Desired 2-day outcome is __. Preferred delivery is remote / on-site.

Review Workshop

Side-by-side

The full comparison table.

Job-Ready Track

ABCsteps AI Engineering Course · Job-Ready Track

Price
INR 4,999
Launch status
Founder launch price · ready for first paid learner
Ready now
Written syllabus is live now; study pack, WhatsApp Q&A, project rubric, and rolling video access are delivered directly after fit confirmation.
First-customer fit
A self-motivated learner who has read enough of the public syllabus to trust the teaching style and wants founder support without live cohort pressure.
Proof outcome
A GitHub repository, setup notes, demo path, AI feature boundary note, and final written project review.
Duration
20 lessons across 4 modules · learn at your pace
Format
The 20-lesson written syllabus is publicly readable on this site with no signup, email gate, or paywall. The paid Job-Ready Track adds founder-led video walkthroughs (rolling out), the downloadable study pack, direct WhatsApp Q&A with Divyanshu, and a final project review with written feedback.
Capacity
Open enrollment — founder delivery scales until support quality says otherwise
Live time with Divyanshu
Async WhatsApp Q&A
Best for
Students and self-learners who want the production version of the curriculum (videos + pack + support)
Not for
Learners happy reading the public lessons on this site without the videos or support — that is genuinely fine and explicitly the model

Cohort

Cohort — Live group track

Price
INR 14,999 per cohort batch
Launch status
First cohorts open after fit-confirmed learner interest
Ready now
Batch dates are confirmed manually on WhatsApp once enough right-fit learners are ready; no automated calendar or checkout is shown before the batch is real.
First-customer fit
A learner who stalls in self-paced courses, needs scheduled live accountability, and can attend Saturday/Sunday IST calls.
Proof outcome
Module demos, peer accountability, a reviewed final project, and cohort call notes from the live learning cycle.
Duration
4 weeks · weekly group calls · final project review
Format
Everything in Job-Ready support + four 90-minute group calls (Saturday/Sunday IST) + a final project review
Capacity
~4 cohorts per year, ~15 learners per cohort
Live time with Divyanshu
4 × 90-min group calls
Best for
Learners who do better with scheduled accountability than pure self-pace
Not for
Pure self-pacers who would skip live calls anyway (Job-Ready support is enough)

Mentorship

1:1 Mentorship

Price
INR 49,999 per mentee · 8-week engagement
Launch status
Application-only founder capacity
Ready now
Scheduled manually after a fit conversation; strongest when the learner brings a real project, role transition, founder question, or career decision.
First-customer fit
A career switcher, founder, or engineer with stakes high enough that private review is worth more than another course.
Proof outcome
Reviewed code or project direction, four session notes, and a written next-step roadmap.
Duration
8 weeks · 4 × 1-hour private sessions
Format
Everything in Cohort support + four private 1-hour video sessions with Divyanshu over 8 weeks
Capacity
Capacity-limited — up to 5 mentees per month while quality remains high
Live time with Divyanshu
4 × 1-hr private sessions
Best for
Career changers making a serious move — engineering bootcamp graduates, switchers from non-tech
Not for
Learners who do not have a real project, role, or career question to bring (the structure of 1:1 needs concrete material)

Architecture Review

Project Architecture Review

Price
INR 24,999 per session
Launch status
Professional service · scoping required
Ready now
One concrete codebase, architecture decision, vendor choice, or product direction reviewed after a pre-session questionnaire.
First-customer fit
An engineer, founder, or technical lead with a specific decision expensive enough to justify a serious second opinion.
Proof outcome
A 2-hour review, 5-page roadmap, prioritized risks, and honest what-to-skip recommendations.
Duration
~1 week of pre-work + 2-hour session + roadmap doc
Format
A senior-level review of your project, codebase, or architecture decision — for engineers who do not need the course but need a serious second opinion
Capacity
Ad-hoc, ~24 sessions per year (founder bandwidth limit)
Live time with Divyanshu
1 × 2-hr private session
Best for
Senior engineers debugging an architecture decision
Not for
Beginners — this assumes you can articulate a real project / codebase / decision

Workshop

Institutional Workshop

Price
INR 2L–5L quoted after scoping
Launch status
Institutional scoping only
Ready now
A 2-day agenda is drafted after a no-cost scoping call; on-site delivery outside Jodhpur requires separate travel and lodging.
First-customer fit
A college, school, bootcamp, or engineering team with 20-60 participants and a clear AI-engineering capability goal.
Proof outcome
Custom agenda, participant workbook, command sheets, working-session artifacts, and post-workshop review call.
Duration
2 full days (16 hours) on-site or remote
Format
A custom 2-day intensive for institutions — colleges, schools, engineering teams. Modules tuned to the audience and stack.
Capacity
4–6 institutional engagements per year
Live time with Divyanshu
2 full days (16 hrs)
Best for
Colleges (BCA / B.Tech / MCA) building practical AI / cloud capability in their CS department
Not for
Individual learners — the learner support paths above are designed for individuals

Why direct enrollment

The doctrine for this phase.

Founder-confirmed enrollment

Every learner is matched to the right support path on a short WhatsApp conversation. The conversation costs nothing and prevents the failure mode where someone over-pays for support they did not need.

Static study packs, not portals

Support materials are durable downloads — PDFs, command sheets, project rubrics — that work offline and remain usable outside a login portal. A learner dashboard arrives when learner volume justifies the engineering effort.

Public-trust depth first

The blog and curriculum are substantive surfaces — long-form articles, full lessons, glossary, reading paths — built for learner trust first. Support pages explain what each path changes, what it can deliver now, and what proof should come out.